no really?

so the New York Times believes they aren't diverse enough. After the Jayson Blair thing, they formed a committee to "investigate" diversity at the paper. But most importantly, the paper found that:

...no evidence connects Blair's transgressions to the diversity efforts then in place at The Times, but that the perception of such a link still lingers: "[in] the minds of many, however, Mr. Blair remains an example of newspaper diversity run amok."

No really? They needed a 23-person council to figure that out?